Elucidating the tractatus
Marie Mc Ginn holds a bachelor's degree from the University of Manchester and a BPhil and DPhil from University of Oxford, and taught at Oxford, the University of Wisconsin in Madison and University of York.has been dominated by a (sometimes rather contrived) disagreement between irresolute and resolute readings.So does not the interest of the Tractatus mostly lie in its capacity to furnish a particularly vivid exemplar of the sort of philosophy that the mature Wittgenstein was most concerned to reject?So is it not true that the only real reason to worry about the Tractatus is to become clear about what sort of thing it was that the later Wittgenstein was most against in philosophy?By contrast, Diamond argued, to take seriously Wittgenstein's statement about the nonsensicality of his book is to abandon the view that it contains a theory or gives expression to any truths, the notion of a nonsensical theory or truth being ultimately incomprehensible.
Much of the secondary literature on Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, either implicitly or explicitly, answers these questions largely in the affirmative.
Majetschak, Stefan; Weiberg, Anja Aesthetics Today: Contemporary Approaches to the Aesthetics of Nature and of Arts.
Proceedings of the 39th International Wittgenstein Symposium in ...
Marie Mc Ginn's principal aim in this book is to develop an alternative interpretative line, which rejects the idea, central to the metaphysical reading, that Wittgenstein sets out to ground the logic of our language in features of an independently constituted reality, but which allows that he aims to provide positive philosophical insights into how language functions.
Mc Ginn takes as a guiding principle the idea that we should see Wittgenstein's early work as an attempt to eschew philosophical theory and to allow language itself to reveal how it functions.